Archive for June, 2011
12 hour fasting. Why you no like me?
Posted by Sean on June 2, 2011
Posted in random | Leave a Comment »
WARNING: Life itself is possibly carcinogenic
Posted by Sean on June 1, 2011
Yep, I’m making a ‘funny’.
Here are a couple links to this new ‘scare’ about cell phones being linked to actually ‘causing’ cancer, ergo being a carcinogen.
Yahoo News: us_cancer_cellphones
Consumer Reports: cell-phone-radiation-possibly-carcinogenic
CNN: cell.phones.radiation.levels
That last link is actually dissecting the different models of phones and the amount of radiation they are emitting.
Geesh.
Let’s make a couple things clear here. The WHO made the statement ‘possibly’ carcinogenic. Possibly can mean a whole lot of something, and a whole lot of nothing. Possibly is not conclusive. I mean your car, your clothing, your computer and everything electromagnetic can ‘possibly’ be carcinogenic. There has been no definitive cause-and-effect relationship between cell phones and cancer. And ultimately there will probably be a relationship in years to come, but I highly doubt anyone can prove them to be causal, there are simply way to may extraneous variables and factors.
I still haven’t seen the published and reproducible evidence via random controlled studies that prove these ‘warnings’. And I’m betting we probably will never see them, because it’s just simply not possible to control the ‘environment’.
I still can’t believe they made an official statement using the words ‘possibly carcinogenic’. Just about anything that exists in our world can be ‘possibly carcinogenic’. The very idea that something is or is not carcinogenic is going under the guided proof that something is directly responsible for causing cancer, any cancer.
Oh, and in case you were wondering, just about everything out there can potentially increase your risk of cancer. Sorry folks.
Aren’t we putting the cart before the horse here? Isn’t this just a lil bit of grand standing or even quite possibly inciting hysteria?
WHO: Cell phone use can increase possible cancer risk
By Danielle Dellorto, CNN
(CNN) — Radiation from cell phones can possibly cause cancer, according to the World Health Organization. The agency now lists mobile phone use in the same "carcinogenic hazard" category as lead, engine exhaust and chloroform.
Before its announcement Tuesday, WHO had assured consumers that no adverse health effects had been established.
A team of 31 scientists from 14 countries, including the United States, made the decision after reviewing peer-reviewed studies on cell phone safety. The team found enough evidence to categorize personal exposure as "possibly carcinogenic to humans."
What that means is they found some evidence of increase in glioma and acoustic neuroma brain cancer for mobile phone users, but have not been able to draw conclusions for other types of cancers
"The biggest problem we have is that we know most environmental factors take several decades of exposure before we really see the consequences," said Dr. Keith Black, chairman of neurology at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles.
The type of radiation coming out of a cell phone is called non-ionizing. It is not like an X-ray, but more like a very low-powered microwave oven.
"What microwave radiation does in most simplistic terms is similar to what happens to food in microwaves, essentially cooking the brain," Black said. "So in addition to leading to a development of cancer and tumors, there could be a whole host of other effects like cognitive memory function, since the memory temporal lobes are where we hold our cell phones."
Wireless industry responded to Tuesday’s announcement saying it "does not mean cell phones cause cancer." CTIA-The Wireless Association added that WHO researchers "did not conduct any new research, but rather reviewed published studies."
The European Environmental Agency has pushed for more studies, saying cell phones could be as big a public health risk as smoking, asbestos and leaded gasoline. The head of a prominent cancer-research institute at the University of Pittsburgh sent a memo to all employees urging them to limit cell phone use because of a possible risk of cancer.
"When you look at cancer development — particularly brain cancer — it takes a long time to develop. I think it is a good idea to give the public some sort of warning that long-term exposure to radiation from your cell phone could possibly cause cancer," said Dr. Henry Lai, research professor in bioengineering at University of Washington who has studied radiation for more than 30 years.
Results from the largest international study on cell phones and cancer was released in 2010. It showed participants in the study who used a cell phone for 10 years or more had doubled the rate of brain glioma, a type of tumor. To date, there have been no long-term studies on the effects of cell phone usage among children.
"Children’s skulls and scalps are thinner. So the radiation can penetrate deeper into the brain of children and young adults. Their cells are at a dividing faster rate, so the impact of radiation can be much larger." said Black of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center.
In February, a study by researchers at the National Institutes of Health, revealed radiation emitted after just 50 minutes on a mobile phone increases the activity in brain cells. The effects of brain activity being artificially stimulated are still unknown.
Neurosurgeon and CNN chief medical correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta says Tuesday’s announcement, "dealt a blow to those who have long said, ‘There is no possible mechanism for cell phones to cause cancer.’ By classifying cell phones as a possible carcinogen, they also seem to be tacitly admitting a mechanism could exist."
Manufacturers of many popular cell phones already warn consumers to keep their device away from their body and medical experts say there other ways to minimize cell phone radiation.
The Apple iPhone 4 safety manual says users’ radiation exposure should not exceed FCC guidelines: "When using iPhone near your body for voice calls or for wireless data transmission over a cellular network, keep iPhone at least 15 millimeters (5/8 inch) away from the body."
BlackBerry Bold advises users to "keep the BlackBerry device at least 0.98 inch (25 millimeters) from your body when the BlackBerry device is transmitting."
The logic behind such recommendations is that the further the phone is from the body, the less radiation is absorbed. Users can also use the speakerphone function or a wired earpiece to gain some distance.
Users can text instead of talk if they want to keep the phone away from their faces.
Finally, cell phones emit the most radiation when they are attempting to connect to cellular towers. A moving phone, or a phone in an area with a weak signal, has to work harder, giving of more radiation. So users can avoid using their cell phones in elevators, buildings and rural areas if they want to reduce their exposure, experts say.
WHO: Cell phone use can increase possible cancer risk – CNN.com
Posted in health, opinion | Tagged: cancer, cell phone, media | Leave a Comment »
Herbal urban legends
Posted by Sean on June 1, 2011
So I decided to share a comical story about how nurses (or anyone in the health care field) refuse to believe in anything other than Western medicine, until proven wrong. LOL
Myth versus medicine
What a nice break from school. During my interim break between the spring and summer semester, we went on a nice Caribbean vacation. It was our first time in St. Thomas, and I must say it was breathtaking. If you ever get the chance or opportunity be sure to take the trip. The overall experience was beyond description.
During our trip we got to swim with the sea turtles as well as take a nice sunset cruise. Both were enjoyed via a Catamaran boat – another first. I, for one, have been on other boats, but my wife has not. This was quite the gamble since my wife can get nauseous quite easily (she has been known to get car sick).
The irony of it all is that my wife is a fellow nurse. So you’d think she has the cast iron stomach that is pretty much a requirement to do our job. Somehow she only gets the ‘motion’ sickness. And like I said, the boat trips were a gamble.
It was recommended by the local staff that we seek out the boat crew to have her take some ginger (Ginger?? Really??). They claimed it calmed the stomach (we weren’t buying it).
We knew she needed medication. Some sort of anticholinergic would do the trick. We got lucky and found an OTC medication that had meclizine in it. We thought we were set. We had a plan: Take some before, take it right when she boards and then possibly during the trip. They were chewable which of course helped.
The trip out for the turtle swim went without incident. We got in the water and saw some amazing turtles and other marine life (honestly I’m really downplaying how truly amazing it was!). Once she got out of the water and back on the boat she got the ‘wave’ of nausea that everyone hates. She immediately took another dose of that OTC med.
She spent the next 15 minutes battling through it like a trooper — watching the land, keeping her eyes off the water and anything that moved. She did the purse-lip breathing. She did everything shy of standing on her head (as if that would have helped).
During the entire ‘wave of nausea’ episode the boat crew and captain wouldn’t stop talking about the darn ginger! Take the ginger ‘concoction’ — it’s the spice mixed in with some ginger ale (and up until I typed this sentence I never realized it was ‘ginger’ in ginger ale – go figure that one out?). They swore up and down it will get rid of the nausea.
Since her nausea was not going away, she caved in and took the ginger concoction. She had to ‘chug’ the stuff, which she tells me was not the most tasty.
Within 15-20 minutes her nausea disappeared…
…
…as if she never got nauseous in the first place!!
…
????
We were THE BIGGEST skeptics about this ‘natural’ remedy. And had I not seen it with my own two eyes and had it not been my wife, I probably would still tell you your full of it.
This trip made us believers.
Needless to say the next day when we took our sunset cruise, the boat crew had her ‘ginger’ waiting for her and she never once got nauseous.
This was one of those instances where all your education and experience don’t mean squat and you just have to go on faith and believe those who just ‘know better.’
We are both still laughing at how shocked we were at the results.
Anyone else have any mythical remedies that work better than our standard western medicine practices?
Posted in health, humor | Tagged: herbal, medication, nurse, scrubsmag | Leave a Comment »






